Barack Obama’s “CHANGE”
by Rob Hood (8/26/08)
Barack Obama is the most talked about, most media worshipped political celebrity of all time. He has received praise from Keith Olberman, German crowds , and a host of media outlets like ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN. He has been called many names both good and bad. Names like “the messiah” has often been associated with Obama by conservatives because he is worshipped by some on the left as if he were God and apparently performed miracles during speeches - remember those who fainted and were raised by a bottle of Obama’s water. Names like the anti-Christ has also been given to him by some conservatives because of his obvious ability to speak well and be able to draw crowds with an almost uncanny charisma.
However, the real Obama is yet to be exposed. Most, by now, know his ties to radical left wing “evangelicals” like Rev. Wright and some others who are associated with apostasy. He has ties to Marxists, and radical left wingers like George Soros and others who wish to “CHANGE” American society into some kind of socialist utopia where free handouts are passed around from the pockets of hard working Americans into the hands of “poor people”.
I listen to a radio show host in the morning called Paul Gallo. He once explained what it is like to be “poor” in America”
1) Poor people in America usually have running water.
2) Poor People in America usually have electricity.
3) Many,if not most, poor people in America have cable/satellite television.
4) Many, if not most, poor people in America have a cell phone.
5) Many poor people in America have at least 1 or two, maybe even three cars.
6) Many poor people in America eat well - including junk food
7) Many poor people in America have jewelry,.
I think you get the picture. I personally have witnessed some of these “poor people” who usually have more stuff than I do. I have know people who applied for Medicaid who owned a Lincoln car, a big screen television complete with satellite, two or three cell phones, a pretty decent house, etc. Now, the bad part is that these people actually got on Medicaid - probably by lying. At what point does the government stop checking the credentials of the applicants and stop giving handouts to those who want more stuff, but do not want to pay for it? As a matter of fact if you know anyone like this, I urge you to turn them in to the local Medicaid office for fraud because you and I pay for this out of our own hard earned money.
I have seen people divorce and still live together so that their children could get government benefits. Once again, a fraud. I have to pay for this.
Barack Obama’s utopian view of “free” healthcare is another fraud. There is no way under the Sun that America could become a socialist handout country even if most of us wanted it. First of all, we cannot afford to raise taxes to pay for healthcare for every America. It would bankrupt America in very little time. The system would collapse.
If a political candidate is interested in healthcare then they should stop associating with pharmaceutical companies and make them find a cure for cancer and other diseases instead of just treatments. As long as we have crooked politicians(Democrat and Republican) this will never happen. Politicians should never be allowed to take money from healthcare companies, oil companies, or any company for that matter. The job of the official is to make laws and regulate commerce, not to snuggle up with fat cats trying to make a few dollars at the tax payers expense.
Think about it. When was the last time a disease was actually cured? If I am not mistaken I believe it was Polio. Think about this. Why would a company provide a cure for cancer when they can stand to make billions more from treatments? You see, a cure does not make the company any money. This type of attitude should be condemned as treason before our legislators, but instead is rewarded with expensive dinners and private party invitations.
Barack Obama really is the candidate of change for numerous reasons:
1) He wants to change gun laws to make sure that the average citizen cannot protect himself/herself in the event of an attack, robbery, or in his case, a government police state, which is what the Second Amendment was for anyway. The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, but with individual citizens being able to protect themselves from their own government if it should ever stray from its foundlings.
2) He wants to change traditional family values to a system where “anything goes” type of mentality. Gay marriage, civil unions, etc. He wishes to have a European style America.
3) He wants to change abortion laws - or practically do away with restrictions on abortion altogether. Infanticide is the goal. Democrats are frauds when it comes to this subject. They blame conservatives when we talk about the life of the child inside the womb and criticize conservatives when we refuse to buy into socialism to support he child after the birth.
4) He want to change our tax codes to increase taxes on an already burdened America. Instead we should decrease spending (that goes for the Republicans too). If they would stop dipping into Social Security for reasons that do not have anything to do with Social Security, the plenty of money would be left for thus program. Money management is the answer, not higher taxation to pay for socialism.
Absolutely Barack Obama is a candidate of change, but I am afraid it’s change for the worst. I doubt if he will confront enemies when they threaten us or anyone else. That was evident when Russia invaded Georgia. Obama ignored it. Will he ignore Iran and their threat to wipe Israel off the map? Will they ignore Russia’s threat to punish Israel for getting involved with Georgia? Will he ignore Hezbollah? Taliban? HAMAS?
Speaking of HAMAS, why has no one in the media talked about Obama’s financial connections with the terrorist organization HAMAS?
Obama is a well spoken man. A well mannered man. A well dressed and persuasive man. But he is a very charismatic man who seeks to deceive with his message of change. He is know as the most liberal member of the Senate and for good reasons I suspect. He is well financed by Soros,and other shady characters with an almost evil passion for a secular one world government hell-bent on destroying traditional values, borders, culture, and Christianity.
He claims to be Christian, but his former church was an apostate church who preached against the word of God rather than for it. Everything that church stood for stood in direct opposition to what the Bible teaches about homosexuality, murder (abortion), and God in general.
Barack Obama may or may not be the next president, but he will always be the candidate of change - whether you view his method of change as good or bad.REFERENCES:
Obama’s church pro-Hamas
Mar 19, 2008 ... Why would a church print an article in support of Hamas?
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/swank/080319
Power Line: Hamas Endorses Obama
The interview produced a scoop which, for some reason, has not been widely publicized: Hamas has endorsed Barack Obama for President. ...
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020315.php
Illegal cash to Obama: WND stands accused
Aug 7, 2008 ... Illegal cash to Obama: WND stands accused Website suggests donation scheme concocted ... The Edwans denied they are affiliated with Hamas. ...
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=71651
|
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Contributors, authors, columnists and editor are not paid.
Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of the USA Sentinel.
Content is Copyright ©2006-2012 the individual authors.
